On Friday, July 25, 2025, Pastor Kesiena Esiri, founder of the Remnant Christian Network, publicly slammed streamer Peller and gospel singer Ebuka Songs, accusing them of ridiculing Christianity in a viral video—sparking fierce backlash and a potential lawsuit.
What Went Down
The controversy began when a video surfaced online showing Peller alongside Ebuka Emmanuel Hillary (aka Ebuka Songs). During the encounter, Peller was seen speaking in tongues and delivering a prophecy, while Ebuka Songs sang. Pastor Esiri condemned the scene, branding Peller a “clown” and accusing him and the gospel singer of mocking genuine spiritual expression. He claimed the emotional display was fake, deceptive, and possibly diabolical.
On Ebuka Songs
Esiri also recounted a prior encounter during which Ebuka reportedly ministered at a local gathering. According to the pastor, after singing as if in the “spirit,” Ebuka was gifted a jeep and immediately dropped the mic and lay on the floor—behavior Esiri suggested was staged and manipulated for attention. Fans claim Esiri warned them early on, saying Ebuka was “in need of help.
Clash Over Morality and Influence
Pastor Esiri has been critical of Peller before—blaming him and his partner, Jarvis, for promoting immorality and supposedly contributing to the mass failure of students in the 2025 UTME. Esiri claimed that youth spend hours on their content, idolizing them and neglecting responsibilities. Peller denied any link to academic decline and threatened to sue, accusing the pastor of using his name to solicit offerings from church members
Reactions & Public Sentiment
Fans and Followers Speak Out
Supporters of Esiri praised his candor:
“The pastor is 100% right. How can someone like Ebuka… make jokes of tongues… This is blasphemy.”
Others echoed agreement, invoking biblical prophets like Nathan:
“He’s speaking harsh truth… this world we’re too sensitive.”
Voices in Ebuka’s Corner
Meanwhile, critics see the pastor’s remarks as judgmental and outdated. Some argue that Ebuka’s performance could be heartfelt worship and that Esiri’s condemnation lacks nuance.
Investigative & Human‑Interest Angle
Contradictions & Questions
Despite Esiri’s claims, observers note that the video doesn’t conclusively prove mockery. There’s no clear evidence of intent, staging, or deception. The emotional reaction to being gifted a jeep could reflect genuine gratitude—not manipulation.
Culture Clash: Generational Fault Lines
This showdown highlights wider tensions: traditional religious gatekeepers vs the digital youth culture. Esiri represents an older worldview wary of social media’s impact on youth behavior. Peller’s camp defends creative freedom, insisting that influence is personal choice—not coercion.
Legal experts warned that defamation claims between public figures hinge on proof. As Peller’s legal threat looms, resolution may hinge on whether Esiri can demonstrate that his statements were defamatory or simply opinion.
With Peller threatening legal action and Esiri doubling down on his critique, this clash is far from over. It poses deeper questions: Is spiritual expression commodified in the digital age? When does prophecy or worship cross into performance?
Both sides have filed their narratives into public consciousness—now they’ll need to prove them in the court of law or in broader public opinion. Stay tuned for updates as the drama evolves.
